Randomized trial of zileuton for treatment of COPD exacerbations requiring hospitalization


Woodruff PG, Albert RK, Bailey WC, Casaburi R, Connett JE, Cooper JAD, Criner GJ, Curtis JL, Dransfield MT, Han MLK, Harnden SM, Kim V, Marchetti N, Martinez FJ, McEvoy CE, Niewoehner DE, Reilly JJ, Rice K, Scanlon PD, Scharf SM, Sciurba FC, Washko GR, Lazarus SC. Randomized trial of zileuton for treatment of COPD exacerbations requiring hospitalization. COPD 2011;8(1):21-9.

Date Published:

2011 Feb


RATIONALE: Leukotrienes have been implicated in the pathogenesis of acute exacerbations of COPD, but leukotriene modifiers have not been studied as a possible therapy for exacerbations. OBJECTIVE: We sought to test the safety and efficacy of adding oral zileuton (a 5-lipoxygenase inhibitor) to usual treatment for acute exacerbations of COPD requiring hospitalization. METHODS: Randomized double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel group study of zileuton 600 mg orally, 4 times daily versus placebo for 14 days starting within 12 hours of hospital admission for COPD exacerbation. Primary outcome measure was hospital length of stay; secondary outcomes included treatment failure and biomarkers of leukotriene production. MAIN FINDINGS: Sixty subjects were randomized to zileuton and 59 to placebo (the study was stopped short of enrollment goals because of slow recruitment). There was no difference in hospital length of stay (3.75 +/- 2.19 vs. 3.86 +/- 3.06 days for zileuton vs. placebo, p = 0.39) or treatment failure (23% vs. 27% for zileuton vs. placebo, p = 0.63) despite a decline in urinary LTE(4) levels in the zileuton-treated group as compared to placebo at 24 hours (change in natural log-transformed ng/mg creatinine -1.38 +/- 1.19 vs. 0.14 +/- 1.51, p < 0.0001) and 72 hours (-1.32 +/- 2.08 vs. 0.26 +/- 1.93, p<0.006). Adverse events were similar in both groups. PRINCIPAL CONCLUSIONS: While oral zileuton during COPD exacerbations that require hospital admission is safe and reduces urinary LTE(4) levels, we found no evidence suggesting that this intervention shortened hospital stay, with the limitation that our sample size may have been insufficient to detect a modest but potentially meaningful clinical improvement.